C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER IV—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER C—MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS › PART 435—ELIGIBILITY IN THE STATES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, AND AMERICAN SAMOA › Subpart J—Eligibility in the States and District of Columbia

42 C.F.R. § 435.900

Scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart sets forth requirements for processing applications, determining eligibility, and furnishing Medicaid.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1982–2019 · leading case: United States v. Michael Bikundi, Sr., 926 F.3d 761 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Michael Bikundi, Sr., 926 F.3d 761 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “05 ; 42 C.F.R. §§ 435.900 - 435.965. A. The D.”
Massachusetts Ass'n of Older Americans v. Alexander Sharp, Ii, Etc., 700 F.2d 749 (1st Cir. 1983). “” 42 C.F.R. § 435.900 (1981). That automatically eligible recipients are covered in this subpart is clear from the inclusion of the regulation prohibiting separate Medicaid applications from AFDC recipients.”
Kessler v. Blum, 591 F. Supp. 1013 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). · cites it 2× “That section provides that a *1030 separate application may not be required for persons who are automatically eligible for Medicaid due to their receipt of AFDC or SSI benefits, thus exempting those “categorically” eligible recipients from the only Medicaid “eligibility”…”
Martin v. Blum, 87 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982). “However, in March, 1979, a new regulation setting standards for Medicaid eligibility had been adopted (42 CFR 435.900 et seq.) regarding retroactive effect of eligibility.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.