42 C.F.R. § 441.250

Applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart applies to sterilizations and hysterectomies reimbursed under Medicaid.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1986–2007 · leading case: Rosson v. Coburn, 876 P.2d 731 (Okla. Civ. App. 1994).
Rosson v. Coburn, 876 P.2d 731 (Okla. Civ. App. 1994). “Regulatory implementation of Title XIX as to sterilizations is found at 42 CFR 441.250 et seq. Section 441.252 requires that State plans for medical assistance provide for payment of sterilization procedures only if requirements of the Medicare regulations are met.”
Methodist Med. Ctr. v. State, 38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 208 (1986). “By Federal regulation (42 C.F.R. 441.250 through 441.259) and State regulation (IDPA Rule 4.”
Isaac v. Jameson Mem'l Hosp., 932 A.2d 924 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007). “1 See 42 C.F.R. § 441.250 et seq, 2 These regulations specify the requirements that must be met in order for a health care provider to receive reimbursement for a sterilization procedure.”
Wrona v. State, 44 Ill. Ct. Cl. 250 (1992). · cites it 2× “Respondent has moved for summary judgment in this action, contending that Claimant has failed to demonstrate compliance with applicable Federal and State regulatory requirements ( 42 C.F.R. §§ 441.250 through 441.259 and related appendix; and 89 Ill.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.