42 C.F.R. § 442.15

Duration of agreement for ICF/IIDs

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The agreement for an ICF/IID remains in effect until the Secretary determines that the facility no longer meets the applicable requirements. The State Survey Agency must conduct a survey of the facility to determine compliance with the requirements at a survey interval of no greater than 15 months.

(b) FFP is available for services furnished by a facility for up to 30 days after its agreement expires or terminates under the conditions specified in § 441.11 of this subchapter.

[77 FR 29031, May 16, 2012]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1981–2005 · leading case: Legacy Healthcare, Inc. v. Barnes & Thornburg, 837 N.E.2d 619 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).
Legacy Healthcare, Inc. v. Barnes & Thornburg, 837 N.E.2d 619 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). “The duration of a Medicaid provider agreement generally may not exceed twelve months 5 42 C.F.R. § 442.15 . The ISDH may also terminate a facility's certification.”
Geriatrics, Inc. v. Harris, 640 F.2d 262 (10th Cir. 1981). “§ 1395cc(a)(1); 42 C.F.R. § 442.15 (a). The state must assure the HEW that the home is licensed, must certify that it meets the standards as set forth in the federal regulations, 42 C.”
Colorado Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 771 F.2d 1422 (10th Cir. 1985). · cites it 3× “42 C.F.R. § 442.15 (a) (1984). The Colorado appeal concerns federal funding while the state attempts to .”
Colo. Dept. of Soc. Serv. v. Dept. of Hlth. & Hum. S., 585 F. Supp. 522 (D. Colo. 1984). “42 C.F.R. § 442.15 (1983). In an unannounced survey in February, 1977, the Health Department found Eventide not operating according to state and federal requirements.”
Colorado Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 585 F. Supp. 522 (D. Colo. 1984). “42 C.F.R. § 442.15 (1983). In an unannounced survey in February, 1977, the Health Department found Eventide not operating according to state and federal requirements.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.