42 C.F.R. § 8.22

Definitions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The following definitions apply to this subpart:

Appellant means:

(1) The OTP which has been notified of its suspension or proposed revocation of its certification under the regulations of this part and has requested a review of the suspension or proposed revocation; or

(2) The Accreditation Body which has been notified of adverse action regarding withdrawal of approval under the regulations of this subpart and has requested a review of the adverse action.

Respondent means SAMHSA.

Reviewing official means the person or persons designated by the Secretary who will informally review the suspension or proposed revocation. The reviewing official may be assisted by one or more Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) officers or employees or consultants in assessing and weighing the scientific and technical evidence and other information submitted by the appellant and respondent on the reasons for the suspension and proposed revocation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2006–2006 · leading case: Telesca v. Long Island Hous. P'ship, Inc., 443 F. Supp. 2d 397 (E.D.N.Y 2006).
Telesca v. Long Island Hous. P'ship, Inc., 443 F. Supp. 2d 397 (E.D.N.Y 2006). “These regulations cover, among other things, requirements for federal funds directed at “multifamily housing projects,” 42 C.F.R. § 8.22 -.27, and “homeownership programs,” id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.