C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER I—PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER H—HEALTH ASSESSMENTS AND HEALTH EFFECTS STUDIES OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES RELEASES AND FACILITIES › PART 93—PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE POLICIES ON RESEARCH MISCONDUCT › Subpart C—Responsibilities of Institutions

42 C.F.R. § 93.311

Investigation time limits

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Time limit for completing an investigation. An institution must complete all aspects of an investigation within 180 days of beginning it, including conducting the investigation, preparing the draft investigation report for each respondent, providing the draft report to each respondent for comment in accordance with § 93.312, and transmitting the institutional record including the final investigation report and decision by the Institutional Deciding Official to ORI in accordance with § 93.316.

(b) Extension of time limit. If unable to complete the investigation in 180 days, the institution must ask ORI for an extension in writing that includes the circumstances or issues warranting additional time.

(c) Progress reports. If ORI grants an extension, it may direct the institution to file periodic progress reports.

(d) Investigation report. If the investigation takes longer than 180 days to complete, the investigation report must include the reasons for exceeding the 180-day period.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2024 · leading case: Mauvis-Jarvis v. Wong
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mauvis-Jarvis v. Wong (2013) illappct · cites it 2× “” 42 C.F.R. § 93.311 (a) (2005). If the institution is unable to complete the investigation within 120 days, it must request, in writing, an extension of time from the ORI.”
Anversa v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc. (2015) mad “¶ 109 (citing 42 C.F.R. § 93.311 (a)-(b)). As alleged by the Plaintiffs, the investigation, therefore, should have been completed by June 28, 2014.”
Yoon v. Garg (2024) ca5 “See 42 C.F.R. § 93.311 . 3 Case: 23-20519 Document: 70-1 Page: 4 Date Filed: 06/06/2024 No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.