43 C.F.R. § 14.1
Scope
This part prescribes procedures for the filing and consideration of petitions for rulemaking.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1980–1982 · leading case: Am. Motorcyclist Ass'n v. Watt, 534 F. Supp. 923 (C.D. Cal. 1981).
Am. Motorcyclist Ass'n v. Watt, 534 F. Supp. 923 (C.D. Cal. 1981). “43 C.F.R. § 14.1 et seq. Since the parties have not adequately briefed the issue of whether there has been an abrogation of the agency’s duties under the Executive Order or regulations, this issue is not addressed on these motions.”
Rowell v. Andrus, 631 F.2d 699 (10th Cir. 1980). “These regulations, which purport to incorporate the requirements of the APA (see 43 C.F.R. § 14.1 ), mandate that the effective date of “final significant rules,” absent an.”
Kenai Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Dep't of the Interior, 671 F.2d 383 (10th Cir. 1982). “§ 553 ; 43 C.F.R. §§ 14.1 — 14.8. However, in our opinion, the Superintendent’s exercise of his discretion not to approve a particular proposal that is based on relevant considerations is not a rule under the APA, which is defined as “a statement of general or particular…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.