C.F.R. » Title 43 » PART 14—PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING

43 C.F.R. § 14.3

Consideration of petitions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The petition will be given prompt consideration and the petitioner will be notified promptly of action taken.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1980–1980 · leading case: Organized Fisherman of Florida v. Andrus, 488 F. Supp. 1351 (S.D. Fla. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Organized Fisherman of Florida v. Andrus, 488 F. Supp. 1351 (S.D. Fla. 1980). · cites it 5× “4 A regulatory analysis is required only if (1) a proposed rule is deemed “significant” as defined in 43 C.F.R. § 14.3 (c)(5); and (2) the rule will have an annual economic effect of $100 million or more, or (3) the potential economic effect is considered sufficiently major even…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.