C.F.R. » Title 43 » CHAPTER II—BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER B—LAND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (2000) Group 2000—Land Resource Management; General › PART 2560—ALASKA OCCUPANCY AND USE › Subpart 2564—Native Townsites

43 C.F.R. § 2564.4

Provisions to be inserted in restricted deeds

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The townsite trustee will note a proper reference to the Act of May 25, 1926, on each deed which is issued under authority of that act and each such deed shall provide that the title conveyed is inalienable except upon approval of the Secretary of the Interior or his authorized representative, and that the issuance of the restricted deed does not subject the tract to taxation, to levy and sale in satisfaction of the debts, contracts or liabilities of the transferee, or to any claims of adverse occupancy or law of prescription; also, if the established streets and alleys of the townsite have been extended upon and across the tract, that there is reserved to the townsite the area covered by such streets and alleys as extended. The deed shall further provide that the approval by the Secretary of the Interior or his authorized representative of a sale by the Indian or Eskimo transferee shall vest in the purchaser a complete and unrestricted title from the date of such approval.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1986–2014 · leading case: Hawkins v. Attatayuk, 322 P.3d 891 (Alaska 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hawkins v. Attatayuk, 322 P.3d 891 (Alaska 2014). “629 ; 43 C.F.R. § 2564.4 (2014). 3 . Federal Land Policy and Management Act, P.”
Stockbridge-Munsee Cmty. v. United States, 593 F. Supp. 2d 44 (D.D.C. 2009). “When Interior places land into trust, the placement preempts state and local regulation of the use of the land.”
Aleknagik Natives, Ltd. v. United States, 635 F. Supp. 1477 (D. Alaska 1986). “” 43 CFR §§ 2564.4 , 2564.6-2564.7. The date that each particular subdivisional survey was approved represented a cutoff date for new occupancy claims on the lands contained in that survey: no individual could begin occupying any of these lands under the townsite laws after that…”
Aleknagik Natives Ltd. v. United States, 806 F.2d 924 (9th Cir. 1986). “43 C.F.R. §§ 2564.4 , 2564.6-2564.7 (1971).”
Stockbridge-Munsee Cmty., Band of Mohican Indians v. United States of Am. (D.D.C. 2009). “§ 465 ; 43 C.F.R. § 2564.4 ; 25 C.F.R. §§ 1.4 , 152.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.