43 C.F.R. § 4.1384
Burdens of proof
(a) OSM shall have the burden of going forward to present a prima facie case of the validity of the decision.
(b) The person filing the request for review shall have the ultimate burden of persuasion by a preponderance of the evidence that the decision is in error.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2001–2001 · leading case: Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 251 F.3d 1007 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 251 F.3d 1007 (D.C. Cir. 2001). “But the same allocation of burdens of proof is made in 43 C.F.R. § 4.1384 (1999), which governs review of OSM’s decisions regarding the existence and status of ownership and control links in the AVS.”
Natl Mining Assn v. DOI, 251 F.3d 1007 (D.C. Cir. 2001). “But the same allocation of burdens of proof is made in 43 C.F.R. 4.1384 (1999), which governs review of OSM's decisions regarding the existence and status of ownership and control links in the AVS.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.