43 C.F.R. § 4.704

Reconsideration

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Unless otherwise provided by regulation, reconsideration of a decision may be granted only in extraordinary circumstances and upon a finding of sufficient reasons by the Director or a presiding officer appointed by them. Requests for reconsideration must specify the purported error and must be filed within 15 days of the date of the decision, or the specific deadline provided in the regulations relating to the particular type of proceeding. The filing of a request for reconsideration will not stay the effectiveness of a decision unless ordered by the Director or appointed Ad Hoc Board or presiding officer or otherwise provided by statute or regulation. A request for reconsideration need not be filed to exhaust administrative remedies unless otherwise provided by statute or regulation.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1978–1978 · leading case: Koniag, Inc., the Vill. of Uyak v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Litnik Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, Salamatof Vill. Ass'n & Cook Inlet Region, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Anton Larsen Bay Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Uganik Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Bells Flats Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Ayakulik Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Port William Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Solomon Bering Straits Native Corp. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, Vill. of Alexander Creek Cook Inlet Region, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, 580 F.2d 601 (D.C. Cir. 1978).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Koniag, Inc., the Vill. of Uyak v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Litnik Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, Salamatof Vill. Ass'n & Cook Inlet Region, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Anton Larsen Bay Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Uganik Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Bells Flats Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Ayakulik Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Port William Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, the Vill. of Solomon Bering Straits Native Corp. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, Vill. of Alexander Creek Cook Inlet Region, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, 580 F.2d 601 (D.C. Cir. 1978). “2(a)(5); 43 CFR 4.704). It is clearly the purpose of such hearings to enable the Secretary, through the Board, to fulfill his statutory obligation of deciding village eligibility appeals with the fullest possible command of the relevant facts.”

Koniag, Inc. v. Andrus, 580 F.2d 601 (D.C. Cir. 1978). “-2(a)(5); 43 CFR 4.704). It is clearly the purpose of such hearings to enable the Secretary, through the Board, to fulfill his statutory obligation of deciding village eligibility appeals with the fullest possible command of the relevant facts.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.