43 C.F.R. § 4.901

What is the purpose of this subpart?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart tells you how the time limits of 30 U.S.C. 1724(h) apply to appeals subject to this subpart.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1979–1979 · leading case: Rowe v. United States, 464 F. Supp. 1060 (D. Alaska 1979).
Rowe v. United States, 464 F. Supp. 1060 (D. Alaska 1979). “This Order will obviate the confusion and delay of multiple appeals, determinations of jurisdiction under this regulation, and case transfers under 43 CFR 4.901(c). The Department’s administrative remedies afford administrative due process to those who hold or assert property…”
— 43 C.F.R. § 4.901(c) — 1 case
Rowe v. United States, 464 F. Supp. 1060 (D. Alaska 1979). “This Order will obviate the confusion and delay of multiple appeals, determinations of jurisdiction under this regulation, and case transfers under 43 CFR 4.901(c). The Department’s administrative remedies afford administrative due process to those who hold or assert property…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.