C.F.R. » Title 43 » CHAPTER II—BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER D—RANGE MANAGEMENT (4000) Group 4100—Grazing Administration › PART 4100—GRAZING ADMINISTRATION—EXCLUSIVE OF ALASKA › Subpart 4110—Qualifications and Preference

43 C.F.R. § 4110.2-2

Specifying grazing preference

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) All grazing permits and grazing leases will specify grazing preference, except for permits and leases for designated ephemeral rangelands, where BLM authorizes livestock use based upon forage availability, or designated annual rangelands. Preference includes active use and any suspended use. Active use is based on the amount of forage available for livestock grazing as established in the land use plan, activity plan, or decision of the authorized officer under § 4110.3-3, except, in the case of designated ephemeral or annual rangelands, a land use plan or activity plan may alternatively prescribe vegetation standards to be met in the use of such rangelands.

(b) The grazing preference specified is attached to the base property supporting the grazing permit or grazing lease.

(c) The animal unit months of grazing preference are attached to:

(1) The acreage of land base property on a pro rata basis, or

(2) Water base property on the basis of livestock forage production within the service area of the water.

[71 FR 39503, July 12, 2006]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1998–2009 · leading case: Pub. Lands Council v. Babbitt, 529 U.S. 728 (2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pub. Lands Council v. Babbitt, 529 U.S. 728 (2000). · cites it 2× “" 43 CFR § 4110.2-2 (a) (1998) (emphasis added).”
Stewart v. Kempthorne, 554 F.3d 1245 (10th Cir. 2009). “The grazing preferences are attached to the base property, see 43 C.F.R. § 4110.2-2 (c), and are transferable, see 43 C.”
Pub. Lands Council v. Babbitt, 154 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir. 1998). · cites it 2× “” 43 C.F.R. § 4110.2-2 (a) (1995). Nothing in the TGA precludes the Secretary from promulgating this regulation.”
Pub. Lands Council v. Babbitt, 167 F.3d 1287 (10th Cir. 1999). · cites it 2× “” 43 C.F.R. § 4110.2-2 (a) (1995). Nothing in the TGA precludes the Secretary from promulgating this regulation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.