45 C.F.R. § 1618.4

Duties of recipients

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A recipient shall:

(1) Advise its employees of their responsibilities under the LSC requirements;

(2) Establish procedures, consistent with the notice and hearing requirements of section 1011 of the LSC Act, for determining whether an employee has committed a violation and whether the violation merits a sanction based on consideration of the totality of the circumstances; and

(3) Establish a policy for determining the appropriate sanction to be imposed for a violation, including:

(i) Administrative reprimand if a violation is found to be minor and unintentional, or otherwise affected by mitigating circumstances;

(ii) Suspension and termination of employment; and

(iii) Other sanctions appropriate for enforcement of the LSC requirements.

(b) Before suspending or terminating the employment of any person for a violation, a recipient shall consult the Corporation to ensure that its interpretation of these requirements is consistent with Corporation policy.

(c) This section provides procedural requirements between the Corporation and recipients. It does not create rights for recipient employees.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–1989 · leading case: Young v. Cent. Louisiana Legal Servs., Inc., 432 So. 2d 1072 (La. Ct. App. 1983).
Young v. Cent. Louisiana Legal Servs., Inc., 432 So. 2d 1072 (La. Ct. App. 1983). “" 45 CFR § 1618.4 The plaintiff further alleges in his petition that the Board of Directors of CLLS failed to comply with the termination procedures described in the Legal Services Corporation regulations when it conducted its hearing of the complaints lodged against the…”
D'Avino v. Trachtenburg, 149 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989). “Furthermore, contrary to the petitioner’s further assertions, we find no regulation promulgated pursuant to the Legal Services Corporation Act of 1974, or any internal regulation of the respondent corporation applicable to managerial employees, which establishes the petitioner’s…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.