C.F.R. » Title 45 » SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL ADMINISTRATION › PART 4—SERVICE OF PROCESS

45 C.F.R. § 4.1

Suits against the Department and its employees in their official capacities

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Summonses and complaints to be served by mail on the Department of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, or other employees of the Department in their official capacities should be sent to the General Counsel, Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20201.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case: Terris, Pravlik & Millian, LLP v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Servs., 794 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D.D.C. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Terris, Pravlik & Millian, LLP v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Servs., 794 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D.D.C. 2011). “On July 7, 2010, Shoaibi contacted TPM to state that service of process had not been made properly on CMS under 45 C.F.R. § 4.1 . Sheldon Aff. at ¶ 9; Dkt.”
James Arthur Rowan v. Howard Z. Morgan, Dist. Dir., Soc. Sec. Admin., 747 F.2d 1052 (6th Cir. 1984). “3 Neither Driver, Gross, nor Morgan were persons designated by the Administration to receive process, see 45 C.F.R. § 4.1 , and the Administration did not file a timely proof of claim or object to discharge of Rowan’s debt.”
Hart v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 676 F. Supp. 2d 846 (D. Ariz. 2009). “45 C.F.R. § 4.1 . Service did not arrive at this location under February 17, 2009.”
Ebert v. Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc. (W.D. Ky. 2022). · cites it 2× “1136 (d)(1), 45 C.F.R. § 4.1 and FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c), (i)).”
Shing v. Ctr. Medicare Servs. (D. Maryland 2024). “” 45 C.F.R. § 4.1 . Here, Plaintiff attempted to serve CMS only through serving process on Attorney General Merrick Garland on behalf of CMS.”
Manchanda v. Wang (S.D.N.Y. 2024). “See also 45 C.F.R. 4.1. Plaintiff did not file any affidavit or other document indicating that he did so.”
Terris, Pravlik & Millian, LLP v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Servs. (D.D.C. 2011). “On July 7, 2010, Shoaibi contacted TPM to state that service of process had not been made properly on CMS under 45 C.F.R. § 4.1 . Sheldon Aff. at ¶ 9; Dkt.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.