46 C.F.R. § 67.17
Registry endorsement
(a) A registry endorsement entitles a vessel to employment in the foreign trade; trade with Guam, American Samoa, Wake, Midway, or Kingman Reef; and any other employment for which a coastwise, or fishery endorsement is not required.
(b) Any vessel eligible for documentation under § 67.5 is eligible for a registry endorsement.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2022 · leading case: Am. Great Lakes Ports Ass'n v. Zukunft, 296 F. Supp. 3d 27 (D.C. Cir. 2017).
Am. Great Lakes Ports Ass'n v. Zukunft, 296 F. Supp. 3d 27 (D.C. Cir. 2017). “§ 9302 (a) ; 46 C.F.R. § 67.17 . "District One comprises areas 1 and 2, the U.”
United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins, 520 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2008). “” 46 C.F.R. § 67.17 (a). During the time of the transactions at issue in this case, the ED II operated under this registry endorsement.”
Gallenstein v. Testa, 2014 Ohio 98 (Ohio 2014). “, and it is not referred to as an endorsement in the federal regulations, see 46 C.F.R. 67.17 (registry endorsement), 46 C.”
Wood v. Amerada Hess Corp., 845 F. Supp. 130 (S.D.N.Y. 1994). “§ 12103 (a), 46 C.F.R. § 67.17 -l(c) (1992), Hess endowed those ships with certificates of documentation endorsed for both coastwise and registry use.”
Mount v. Keahole Point Fish, LLC, 147 F. Supp. 3d 1116 (D. Haw. 2015). “46 C.F.R. § 67.17 (a). .Plaintiffs have objected to the admissibility of the letter from the Coast Guard on the grounds that it contains inadmissible hearsay: however, it appears the letter is admissible as admissible hearsay under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8) (public…”
Am. Great Lakes Ports Ass'n v. Zukunft (D.D.C. 2017). “§ 9302 (a); 46 C.F.R. § 67.17 . 2 “District One comprises areas 1 and 2, the U.”
Matson Navigation Co., Inc. v. Dep't of Transp. (D.D.C. 2020). “But, in APL’s view, that is not a problem because a Coast Guard regulation, 46 C.F.R. § 67.17 (a), 27 provides that “[a] registry endorsement entitles a vessel to employment in the foreign trade; trade with Guam, American Samoa, Wake, Midway, or Kingman Reef; and any other…”
Matson Navigation Co., Inc. v. Dep't of Transp. (D.D.C. 2020). “But, in APL’s view, that is not a problem because a Coast Guard regulation, 46 C.F.R. § 67.17 (a), 27 provides that “[a] registry endorsement entitles a vessel to employment in the foreign trade; trade with Guam, American Samoa, Wake, Midway, or Kingman Reef; and any other…”
Atl. Specialty Ins. Co. v. Bindea (W.D. Va. 2022). “” 46 C.F.R. § 67.17 (a). “A coastwise endorsement entitles a vessel to employment in unrestricted trade, dredging, towing, and any other employment for which a registry or fishery endorsement is not required.”
United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins (9th Cir. 2008). “” 46 C.F.R. § 67.17 (a). During the time of the transactions at issue in this case, the KD II operated under this registry endorsement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.