47 C.F.R. § 15.29

Inspection by the Commission

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any equipment or device subject to the provisions of this part, together with any certificate, notice of registration or any technical data required to be kept on file by the operator, supplier or party responsible for compliance of the device shall be made available for inspection by a Commission representative upon reasonable request.

(b) The owner or operator of a radio frequency device subject to this part shall promptly furnish to the Commission or its representative such information as may be requested concerning the operation of the radio frequency device.

(c) The party responsible for the compliance of any device subject to this part shall promptly furnish to the Commission or its representatives such information as may be requested concerning the operation of the device, including a copy of any measurements made for obtaining an equipment authorization or demonstrating compliance with the regulations.

(d) The Commission, from time to time, may request the party responsible for compliance, including an importer, to submit to the FCC Laboratory in Columbia, Maryland, various equipment to determine that the equipment continues to comply with the applicable standards. Shipping costs to the Commission's Laboratory and return shall be borne by the responsible party. Testing by the Commission will be performed using the measurement procedure(s) that was in effect at the time the equipment was authorized.

[54 FR 17714, Apr. 25, 1989, as amended at 82 FR 50831, Nov. 2, 2017]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1994–1997 · leading case: William Leigh Dougan v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, United States of Am., 21 F.3d 1488 (9th Cir. 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

William Leigh Dougan v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, United States of Am., 21 F.3d 1488 (9th Cir. 1994). · cites it 3× “§ 301 and 47 C.F.R. § 15.29 by operating a radio station without a license and by refusing to permit FCC engineers to inspect the station.”

United States v. Any & All Radio Station Transmission Equip., 976 F. Supp. 1255 (D. Minnesota 1997). · cites it 2× “Although in Dougan it was undisputed that the petitioner had violated section 301, the dispute in that case was whether the petitioner violated 47 C.F.R. § 15.29 by refusing to permit FCC engineers to inspect the radio station.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.