47 C.F.R. § 2.901

Basis and purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In order to carry out its responsibilities under the Communications Act and the various treaties and international regulations, and in order to promote efficient use of the radio spectrum, the Commission has developed technical standards and other requirements for radio frequency equipment and parts or components thereof. The technical standards applicable to individual types of equipment are found in that part of the rules governing the service wherein the equipment is to be operated. In addition to the technical standards provided, the rules governing the service may require that such equipment be authorized under Supplier's Declaration of Conformity or receive a grant of certification from a Telecommunication Certification Body.

(b) Sections 2.906 through 2.1077 describe the procedure for a Supplier's Declaration of Conformity and the procedures to be followed in obtaining certification and the conditions attendant to such a grant.

[82 FR 50825, Nov. 2, 2017, as amended at 88 FR 7622, Feb. 6, 2023]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1980–2020 · leading case: In Re Wireless Tel. Radio Frequency Emissions, 216 F. Supp. 2d 474 (D. Maryland 2002).
In Re Wireless Tel. Radio Frequency Emissions, 216 F. Supp. 2d 474 (D. Maryland 2002). “47 C.F.R. §§ 2.901 , 1.1307, 2.1093, 2.1091.”
Bank of Canton, Ltd. v. Repub. Nat'l Bank, 509 F. Supp. 1310 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). “47 C.F.R. § 2.901 (a). “Type approval” of the sort here presented “attaches to all units subsequently marketed by the grantee” which are identical with the model tested by the Commission.”
Pinney v. Nokia, 216 F. Supp. 2d 474 (D. Maryland 2002). “47 C.F.R. §§ 2.901 , 1.1307, 2.1093, 2.1091.”
Cohen v. Apple Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020). “” 47 C.F.R. § 2.901 . Telecommunications Certification 1 complying with applicable technical standards and if granting the application would serve the 2 public interest, convenience, and necessity — the guiding principles behind all discretionary 3 action taken or authorized by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.