47 C.F.R. § 27.52
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2008–2025 · leading case: Bennett v. T-mobile USA, Inc., 597 F. Supp. 2d 1050 (C.D. Cal. 2008).
Bennett v. T-mobile USA, Inc., 597 F. Supp. 2d 1050 (C.D. Cal. 2008). “47 C.F.R. §§ 27.52 and 1.1310. The goal of these Guidelines is to “provide a proper balance between the need to protect the public and workers from exposure to potentially harmful RF electromagnetic fields and the requirement that [the] industry be allowed to provide…”
Eisenstecken v. Tahoe Reg'l Plan. Agency (E.D. Cal. 2025). “See 47 C.F.R. § 27.52 . The provision imposing technical standards states: 17 “Licensees and manufacturers are subject to the radio frequency radiation exposure 18 requirements specified in sections 1.”
Cohen v. Apple Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020). “, 47 C.F.R. § 27.52 . It is these substantive requirements that preempt.”
Alega Pres. Inst. v. AST Telecomm LLC (D. Haw. 2021). “Specifically, the court invited the FCC to address the following questions: (1) Does the TCA provide a private cause of action for violations of FCC regulations regarding RF emissions, 47 C.F.R. §§ 27.52 , 1.1307, 1.1310?2 (2) Does the TCA provide a private cause of action for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.