C.F.R. » Title 47 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL › PART 3—AUTHORIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF ACCOUNTING AUTHORITIES IN MARITIME AND MARITIME MOBILE-SATELLITE RADIO SERVICES

47 C.F.R. § 3.11

Location of settlement operation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Within the United States. A certified accounting authority maintaining all settlement operations, as well as associated documentation, within the United States will be assigned an AAIC with a “US” prefix.

(b) Outside the United States. A certified accounting authority maintaining settlement operations outside the United States will be assigned the same AAIC as that originally assigned to such entity by the administration of the country of origin. However, in no case will an entity be certified as an accounting authority for settlement of U.S. licensed vessel accounts unless the entity is requesting to conduct a settlement operation in the United States or has already been issued an AAIC by another administration.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1963–1963 · leading case: Interstate Broad. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 323 F.2d 797 (D.C. Cir. 1963).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Interstate Broad. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 323 F.2d 797 (D.C. Cir. 1963). · cites it 2× “” 47 C.F.R. § 3.11 (a). But “primary service areas” are “subject to limitation by * * * interference from other stations to the contours set out for each class of station.”
Interstate Broad. Co., Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Patchogue Broad. Co., Inc., Intervenor. Interstate Broad. Co., Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Grossco, Inc., a Connecticut Corp., Intervenor, 323 F.2d 797 (D.C. Cir. 1963). · cites it 2× “' 47 C.F.R. 3.11(a). But 'primary service areas' are 'subject to limitation by * * * interference from other stations to the contours set out for each class of station.”
— 47 C.F.R. § 3.11(a) — 1 case
Interstate Broad. Co., Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Patchogue Broad. Co., Inc., Intervenor. Interstate Broad. Co., Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Grossco, Inc., a Connecticut Corp., Intervenor, 323 F.2d 797 (D.C. Cir. 1963). “' 47 C.F.R. 3.11(a). But 'primary service areas' are 'subject to limitation by * * * interference from other stations to the contours set out for each class of station.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.