47 C.F.R. § 51.313

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1999–2007 · leading case: MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co., 79 F. Supp. 2d 768 (E.D. Mich. 1999).
MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co., 79 F. Supp. 2d 768 (E.D. Mich. 1999). “47 C.F.R. § 51.313 (b). The parties disputed the time period within which Am-eritech should be required to process BFRs.”
NuVox Commc'ns, Inc. v. Edgar, 511 F. Supp. 2d 1198 (N.D. Fla. 2007). “” 47 C.F.R. § 51.313 (a). In the instant case, the interconnection agreement between the parties allows BellSouth to demand a deposit if the existing CLEC does not meet certain standards, such as good payment history.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.