47 C.F.R. § 54.511

Ordering services

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Selecting a provider of eligible services. Except as exempted in § 54.503(e), in selecting a provider of eligible services, schools, libraries, library consortia, and consortia including any of those entities shall carefully consider all bids submitted and must select the most cost-effective service offering. In determining which service offering is the most cost-effective, entities may consider relevant factors other than the pre-discount prices submitted by providers, but price should be the primary factor considered.

(b) Lowest corresponding price. Providers of eligible services shall not submit bids for or charge schools, school districts, libraries, library consortia, or consortia including any of these entities a price above the lowest corresponding price for supported services, unless the Commission, with respect to interstate services or the state commission with respect to intrastate services, finds that the lowest corresponding price is not compensatory. Promotional rates offered by a service provider for a period of more than 90 days must be included among the comparable rates upon which the lowest corresponding price is determined.

[79 FR 59203, Aug. 19, 2014]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2023 · leading case: United States ex rel. Heath v. AT & T, Inc., 791 F.3d 112 (D.C. Cir. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States ex rel. Heath v. AT & T, Inc., 791 F.3d 112 (D.C. Cir. 2015). “47 C.F.R. § 54.511 (a). Once the schools and libraries have reached an agreement with a service provider, they can submit a request for funding approval to the Universal Service Administrative Company.”

United States ex rel. Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc., 111 F. Supp. 3d 923 (E.D. Wis. 2015). “§ 254 (h)(1)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 54.511 (b). Before me now is defendant’s motion to dismiss under Fed.”

Allied Telecom Grp., LLC v. Dist. of Columbia (D.D.C. 2023). · cites it 2× “47 C.F.R. § 54.511 (a). Once the schools and libraries have reached an agreement with a service provider, they can submit a request for funding approval to the Universal Service Administrative Company.”

USA ex rel. Todd Heath v. AT&T, Inc. (D.C. Cir. 2015). “47 C.F.R. § 54.511 (a). Once the schools and libraries have reached an agreement with a service provider, they can submit a request for funding approval to the Universal Service Administrative Company.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.