47 C.F.R. § 54.719

Parties permitted to seek review of Administrator decision

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any party aggrieved by an action taken by the Administrator, as defined in § 54.701, § 54.703, or § 54.705, must first seek review from the Administrator.

(b) Any party aggrieved by an action taken by the Administrator, after seeking review from the Administrator, may then seek review from the Federal Communications Commission, as set forth in § 54.722.

(c) Parties seeking waivers of the Commission's rules shall seek relief directly from the Commission.

[79 FR 49204, Aug. 19, 2014]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2011–2024 · leading case: Consumers' Rsch. v. FCC, 109 F.4th 743 (5th Cir. 2024).
Consumers' Rsch. v. FCC, 109 F.4th 743 (5th Cir. 2024). · cites it 2× “47 C.F.R. § 54.719 (b); Universal Serv. Contribution Methodology, 31 FCC Rcd.”
Sandwich Isles Commc'ns, Inc. v. Nat'l Exch. Carrier Ass'n, 799 F. Supp. 2d 44 (D.D.C. 2011). “at *4 , quoting 47 C.F.R. § 54.719 (c). 8 And as the court concluded in CCND, in this case a claim for damages will only remain if the FCC reverses itself or if the court of appeals finds its ruling to be invalid.”
Todd Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc., 90 F.4th 1193 (7th Cir. 2024). “The USAC makes initial decisions about distributing the money by reviewing subsidy applications from eligible tele- communication providers, but the FCC reviews denials of subsidy applications, 47 C.F.R. § 54.719 (b), offers final guid- ance on policy and interpretation…”
Platsky v. Lifeline Support Ctr. (S.D.N.Y. 2024). “Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 54.719 , “[a]ny party aggrieved by an action taken by the Administrator .”
Sandwich Isles Commc'ns, Inc. v. Nat'l Exch. Carrier Ass'n (D.D.C. 2011). “at *4 , quoting 47 C.F.R. § 54.719 (c). 8 And as the court concluded in CCND, in this case a claim for damages will only remain if the FCC reverses itself or if the court of appeals finds its ruling to be invalid.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.