(a) Each state must review and remove any of its regulations applicable to payphones and payphone service providers that impose market entry or exit requirements.
(b) Each state must ensure that access to dialtone, emergency calls, and telecommunications relay service calls for the hearing disabled is available from all payphones at no charge to the caller.
(c) Each state must review its rules and policies to determine whether it has provided for public interest payphones consistent with applicable Commission guidelines, evaluate whether it needs to take measures to ensure that such payphones will continue to exist in light of the Commission's implementation of Section 276 of the Communications Act, and administer and fund such programs so that such payphones are supported fairly and equitably.
[61 FR 52323, Oct. 7, 1996, as amended at 71 FR 65751, Nov. 9, 2006]
Notes of Decisions
Global Network Commc'ns, Inc. v. City of New York, 562 F.3d 145 (2d Cir. 2009).
· cites it 2× “Global argues that the City’s regulatory scheme is inconsistent with an FCC regulation, 47 C.F.R. § 64.1330 (a), which mandates the removal of any “regulations applicable to payphones and payphone service providers that impose market entry or exit requirements.”
Global Network Commc'ns v. City of New York, 373 F. Supp. 2d 378 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).
“” 47 C.F.R. § 64.1330 (a). In its Report and Order, the FCC elaborated on the meaning of “market entry or exit requirements”: The competition we observe today, how-' ever, has been significantly distorted by government regulation of prices, regulatory barriers to entry and exit,…”
Global Network Commc'ns, Inc. v. City of New York, 507 F. Supp. 2d 365 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).
“” 47 C.F.R. § 64.1330 (a). *374 In its Report and Order, the FCC elaborated on the meaning of “market entry or exit requirements”: The competition we observe today, however, has been significantly distorted by government regulation of prices, regulatory barriers to entry and…”
Global Network Commc'ns, Inc. v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2009).
“Global argues that the City’s regulatory scheme 5 is inconsistent with an FCC regulation, 47 C.F.R. § 64.1330 (a), which mandates the removal of any 6 “regulations applicable to payphones and payphone service providers that impose market entry or 7 exit requirements.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.