47 C.F.R. § 64.702
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29
cases, 1973–2019 · leading case: Vonage Holdings Corp. v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 290 F. Supp. 2d 993 (D. Minnesota 2003).
Vonage Holdings Corp. v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 290 F. Supp. 2d 993 (D. Minnesota 2003). “47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a). Examining the statutory language of the Communications Act, the Court concludes that the VoIP service provided by Vonage constitutes an information service because it offers the “capability for generating, acquiring, storing, transforming, processing,…”
United States v. W. Elec. Co., Inc., 673 F. Supp. 525 (D.D.C. 1987). “" 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (d)(2). That being so, the data communications market will be especially susceptible to discrimination.”
Telecomm. Rsch. & Action Ctr. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 750 F.2d 70 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “"Enhanced services,” as opposed to basic transmission services are those "which employ computer processing applications that act on the format, content, code, protocol or similar aspects of the subscriber’s transmitted information; provide the subscriber additional, different,…”
Mozilla Corp. v. FCC, 940 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “2d at 498; see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a).1 In contrast, 1 Note that the definition of “enhanced services” is restricted to services “offered over common carrier transmission.”
Charter Advanced Servs. (MN), LLC v. Lange, 903 F.3d 715 (8th Cir. 2018). “2007); see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 . The FCC has so far declined to classify VoIP services as either information or telecommunications services, despite repeated opportunities to do so.”
Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 454 F.3d 329 (D.C. Cir. 2006). “AT & T’s claim that it relied on the language of the Commission’s “en *333 hanced services” regulation, 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a), rings hollow. 4 The Commission viewed this regulatory definition, crafted before the Telecommunications Act of 1996 created a statutory class of…”
LinkLine Commc'ns, Inc. v. SBC California, Inc., 503 F.3d 876 (9th Cir. 2007). “See 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (c) (codifying the second "Computer Inquiry").”
Saunders v. Dyck O'Neal, Inc., 319 F. Supp. 3d 907 (W.D. Mich. 2018). “Dyck O'Neal argues that because voicemail is an "information or enhanced service," as opposed to a "telecommunications service," it is not regulated under § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii), according to 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a). Dyck O'Neal conflates the issues and attempts to blur the law.”
MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n United States of Am., Sprint Commc'ns Co., L.P., Intervenors, 57 F.3d 1136 (D.C. Cir. 1995). “Enhanced Service Providers The Commission defines enhanced services as services, offered over common carrier transmission facilities used in interstate commerce, which employ computer processing applications that act on the format, content, code, protocol or similar aspects of…”
Prodigy Servs. Corp., Inc. v. Johnson, 125 S.W.3d 413 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “at 387; see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a)(1989). Database services, in which a customer dials a number to obtain access to stored information, such as Dow Jones News, Lexis, and “Dial It” sports scores, are examples of enhanced services.”
Howard v. Am. Online Inc., 208 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2000). “2d 384 , 417-23, 0080 WL 233301 (1980) (final decision); 47 C.F.R. 64.702(a) (“[EJnhanced service shall refer to services .”
Global NAPs California, Inc. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 624 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2010). “” Under this exemption, telecommunications providers offering services that use “computer processing applications that act on the format, content, code, protocol or similar aspects of the subscriber’s transmitted information; provide the subscriber additional, different, or…”
— 47 C.F.R. § 64.702(a) — 2 cases
Howard v. Am. Online Inc., 208 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2000). “2d 384 , 417-23, 0080 WL 233301 (1980) (final decision); 47 C.F.R. 64.702(a) (“[EJnhanced service shall refer to services .”
No. 98-56138, 208 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2000).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.