47 C.F.R. § 73.1015
Truthful written statements and responses to Commission inquiries and correspondence
The Commission or its representatives may, in writing, require from any applicant, permittee, or licensee written statements of fact relevant to a determination whether an application should be granted or denied, or to a determination whether a license should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the Table of FM Allotments or Table of TV Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of § 1.17 of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1989–2005 · leading case: Zimmer Radio of Mid-Missouri, Inc. v. Lake Broad., Inc., 937 S.W.2d 402 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).
Zimmer Radio of Mid-Missouri, Inc. v. Lake Broad., Inc., 937 S.W.2d 402 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). “The filing of applications for new stations and counterproposals for new allotments to impede inauguration of competitive broadcast services violates FCC *404 regulations (including, but not limited to, 47 C.F.R. 73.1015) and is a violation of the Communications Act of 1934.”
French v. Cmty. Broad. of Coastal Bend, Inc., 766 S.W.2d 330 (Tex. App. 1989). “We need not address any violation of 47 C.F.R. § 73.1015 , since we have already held that portion of the injunction was improper.”
Rainbow/Push Coalition v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 396 F.3d 1235 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “The Commission nonetheless made license renewal subject to an NAL of $8,000 “for willfully omitting material facts in its Form 396 in violation of [ 47 C.F.R. § 73.1015 ].” 16 F.C.C.R. at 3 The Commission disregarded the Abrams complaint, noting that “the licensee states that it…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.