47 C.F.R. § 76.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The rules and regulations set forth in this part provide for the certification of cable television systems and for their operation in conformity with standards for carriage of television broadcast signals, program exclusivity, cablecasting, access channels, and related matters. The rules and regulations in this part also describe broadcast carriage requirements for cable operators and satellite carriers.

[37 FR 3278, Feb. 12, 1972, as amended at 70 FR 21670, Apr. 27, 2005]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1978–2007 · leading case: Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc., 497 F.3d 144 (2d Cir. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc., 497 F.3d 144 (2d Cir. 2007). “See 47 C.F.R. § 76.1 , et seq. According to a FCC fact sheet, analog service that meets these specifications produces a picture that is “high enough in quality to provide enjoyable viewing with barely perceptible impairments.”

Cont'l Cablevision of Michigan, Inc v. City of Roseville, 425 N.W.2d 53 (Mich. 1988). · cites it 2× “Thus, argues petitioner, reservation of these rights in paragraphs two and five of the subscription agreement is not relevant for purposes of proving intent to retain ownership. In fact, petitioner contends that treating the retention of these rights as evidence of ownership…”

Kentucky, Ex Rel. Gorman v. Comcast Cable of Paducah, Inc., 881 F. Supp. 285 (W.D. Ky. 1995). “17,961, 17,969-70 (1994), to be codified at 47 C.F.R. § 76.1 et seq. It would thus be inappropriate to infer a congressional intent to provide private enforcement mechanisms.”

New York State Comm'n on Cable Television v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 571 F.2d 95 (2d Cir. 1978). “See Cable Television Report & Order, 36 FCC2d 143, 147 (hereinafter CTV Report), reconsideration granted in part, 36 FCC2d 326 (1972) (hereinafter CTV Report Reconsideration ); Clarification of the Cable Television Rules, 46 FCC2d 175 (1974) (hereinafter Clarification); 47…”

Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. DIRECTV, Inc. (2d Cir. 2007). “See 47 C.F.R. § 76.1 , et seq. According to a FCC fact sheet, analog service that meets 17 these specifications produces a picture that is “high enough in quality to provide enjoyable 18 viewing with barely perceptible impairments.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.