47 C.F.R. § 76.11

Lockbox enforcement

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Any party aggrieved by the failure or refusal of a cable operator to provided a lockbox as provided for in Title VI of the Communications Act may petition the Commission for relief in accordance with the provisions and procedures set forth in § 76.7 for petitions for special relief.

[50 FR 18661, May 2, 1985]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1974–1986 · leading case: Elec. Indus. Ass'n, Consum. Elec. Grp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States of Am., 554 F.2d 1109 (D.C. Cir. 1976).
Elec. Indus. Ass'n, Consum. Elec. Grp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States of Am., 554 F.2d 1109 (D.C. Cir. 1976). · cites it 7× “to existing operations unless it receives a certificate of compliance from the Commission,” 47 C.F.R. § 76.11 (a) (1975) (emphasis added).”
Nat'l Cable Television Ass'n v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 554 F.2d 1094 (D.C. Cir. 1976). · cites it 7× “to existing operations unless it receives a certificate of compliance from the Commission,’’ 47 C.F.R. § 76.11 (a) (1975) (emphasis added).”
Fed. Power Comm'n v. New England Power Co., 415 U.S. 345 (1974). · cites it 2× “47 CFR § 76.11 (b) (1973). While these new regulations will undoubtedly affect the question of the permissibility of fees imposed for future years, they cannot retroactively validate fees imposed for 1970.”
Three Rivers Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh, 502 F. Supp. 1118 (W.D. Pa. 1980). “A certificate of compliance, which until 1976 had to be obtained before a franchisee could commence operation, 47 C.F.R. § 76.11 (1976 ed.), certified to all concerned that the applicant was in conformity with relevant F.”
Nat'l Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. United States, 415 U.S. 336 (1974). “3280 ) require a CATV to receive a certificate of compliance from the Commission, 47 CFR §76.11 (b), and require it to obtain from the appropriate local government authority a certificate containing prescribed recitations and provisions.”
The Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, & United States of Am., 523 F.2d 1344 (9th Cir. 1975). “11 of the Order, 36 FCC 2d at 217, 47 C.F.R. § 76.11 , provides that no cable television system shall commence operations or add a television broadcast signal to existing operations unless it receives a certificate of compliance from the Commission.”
Comm. for Open Media v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 533 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1976). · cites it 2× “47 C.F.R. § 76.11 (b) (1974). See also id.”
Yakima Valley Cablevision, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 794 F.2d 737 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “47 C.F.R. § 76.11 (1978). . In re Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission’s Rules and Regulations, 59 F.”
KAKE-TV & Radio, Inc. v. United States, 537 F.2d 1121 (10th Cir. 1976). “(47 C.F.R. 76.11(a).) The petitioner KAKE appeared and opposed the application on several grounds.”
Midwest Video Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 571 F.2d 1025 (8th Cir. 1978). “47 C.F.R. § 76.11 . It sets for state and local franchising authorities the conditions they may impose on cable enterprises seeking a franchise to string cable underground or on poles.”
Teleprompter Cable Commc'ns Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 565 F.2d 736 (D.C. Cir. 1977). “2d 185 , 186; 47 C.F.R. § 76.11 (a). . The Commission said: “The petition of Washoe Empire was filed after the period for filing petitions for reconsideration had run and [Community] correctly moved to dismiss.”
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 786 F.2d 370 (10th Cir. 1986). · cites it 2× “2d at 1101 (quoting 47 C.F.R. § 76.11 (a) (1975)) (emphasis in original), the court held: “The issuance of a certificate of compliance under 47 C.”
— 47 C.F.R. § 76.11(a) — 2 cases
KAKE-TV & Radio, Inc. v. United States, 537 F.2d 1121 (10th Cir. 1976). “(47 C.F.R. 76.11(a).) The petitioner KAKE appeared and opposed the application on several grounds.”
Kake-Tv & Radio, Inc. v. United States, 537 F.2d 1121 (10th Cir. 1976).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.