48 C.F.R. § 2.201

2.201 Contract clause.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Insert the clause at 52.202-1, Definitions, in solicitations and contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

[69 FR 34228, June 18, 2004]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2001–2013 · leading case: Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United States, 50 Fed. Cl. 443 (Fed. Cl. 2001).
Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United States, 50 Fed. Cl. 443 (Fed. Cl. 2001). · cites it 2× “Indeed, another FAR section, 48 C.F.R. § 2.201 (2000), requires that the NDI definition.”
Gordon R. England, Sec'y of the Navy v. The Swanson Grp., Inc., 353 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “” 48 C.F.R. § 2.201 ; see also Reflectone, 60 F.”
Demodulation, Inc. v. United States, 103 Fed. Cl. 794 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “2004) (quoting 48 C.F.R. § 2.201 ). For claims over $100,000, the failure of a federal contracting entity to “issue a decision” or “notify the contractor of the time within which a decision will be issued,” within sixty days of receipt of the claim is “deemed to be a decision by…”
Crewzers Fire Crew Transp., Inc. v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 148 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “101 (definition of contracts); 48 C.F.R. § 2.201 (contract clause); 48 C.”
M.E.S., Inc. v. United States, 104 Fed. Cl. 620 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “2004) (quoting 48 C.F.R. § 2.201 ). For claims over $100,000, the failure of a federal contracting entity to “issue a decision” or “notify the contractor of the time within which a decision will be issued,” within sixty days of receipt of the claim is “deemed to be a decision by…”
Nascent Grp., J.V. v. United States, 103 Fed. Cl. 338 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “2004) (quoting 48 C.F.R. § 2.201 ). For claims over $100,000, the failure of a federal contracting entity to “issue a decision” or “notify the contractor of the time within which a decision will be issued,” within sixty days of receipt of the claim is “deemed to be a decision by…”
Crewzers Fire Crew Transp., Inc. v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 267 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “101 (definition of contracts); 48 C.F.R. § 2.201 (contract clause); 48 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.