48 C.F.R. § 52.233-4

52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

As prescribed in 33.215(b), insert the following clause:

Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim (OCT 2004)

United States law will apply to resolve any claim of breach of this contract.

(End of clause) [69 FR 59701, Oct. 5, 2004]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2014–2025 · leading case: Threshold Tech., Inc. v. United States, 117 Fed. Cl. 681 (Fed. Cl. 2014).
Threshold Tech., Inc. v. United States, 117 Fed. Cl. 681 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “” 48 C.F.R. § 52.233-4 (2013) (last revised October 5, 2004).”
New Hampshire Flight Procurement, LLC v. United States, 118 Fed. Cl. 203 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “” 48 C.F.R. § 52.233-4 (2013) (last revised October 5, 2004).”
Goodwin v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co. (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 2× “233-4” to establish federal question jurisdiction, which the Court 8 construes as 48 C.F.R. 52.233-4. This regulation merely states that certain government contracts 9 should contain a term that “United States law will apply to resolve any claim of breach of this 10 contract.”
Goodwin v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co. (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 2× “233-4” to establish federal question jurisdiction, which the 8 Court liberally construes as 48 C.F.R. 52.233-4. This regulation merely states that certain 9 government contracts should contain a term that “United States law will apply to resolve any 10 claim of breach of this…”
Phillips v. Dep't of the Army (S.D. Ala. 2024). “” 48 C.F.R. § 52.233-4 . The parties agree that federal law controls the instant motion.”
Hencely v. Fluor Corp. (D.S.C. 2021). “§ I-115 (incorporating 48 C.F.R. § 52.233-4 )). These FAR clauses establish the basic apparatus of a contract dispute or breach of contract claim under the LOGCAP IV Contract.”
Winston Hencely v. Fluor Corp. (4th Cir. 2024). “See 48 C.F.R. § 52.233-4 (“United States law will apply to resolve any claim of breach of this contract.”
Goodwin v. State Farm Ins. (E.D. Cal. 2025). “9; dismissed for failure to state a claim that 3 invokes this Court’s jurisdiction, failure to prosecute, and failure to comply with a Court order).”
Goodwin v. Soc. Sec. Admin. (E.D. Cal. 2025). “§ 6503 ; 48 C.F.R. 52.233-4; California 13 Insurance Code Section 790.”
Goodwin v. State Farm Ins. (E.D. Cal. 2025). “§ 6503 ; 48 C.F.R. 52.233-4; California Insurance Code 12 Section 790.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.