C.F.R. » Title 48 » CHAPTER 5—GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION › SUBCHAPTER F—SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING › PART 538—FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE CONTRACTING › Subpart 538.2—Establishing and Administering Federal Supply Schedules

48 C.F.R. § 538.270

538.270 Solicitation, evaluation, and award of Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
[87 FR 10314, Feb. 24, 2022]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2010–2015 · leading case: United States Ex Rel. Shemesh v. CA, Inc.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States Ex Rel. Shemesh v. CA, Inc. (2015) dcd · cites it 5× “” 48 C.F.R. § 538.270 (a). The government contracting officer must evaluate offers based on volume, the contractor’s standard prices and discounts, length of the contract period, warranties, and other relevant information.”
United States Ex Rel. Ubl v. IIF Data Solutions (2011) ca4 “See 48 C.F.R. § 538.270 (c). The accuracy of the pricing information provided to GSA by the prospective vendors is thus critical to the MAS process.”
United States Ex Rel. Morsell v. Symantec Corp. (2015) dcd · cites it 2× “¶¶ 31-47, 94; 48 C.F.R. §§ 538.270 , 552.238-75(a); cf.”
United States Ex Rel. Frascella v. Oracle Corp. (2010) vaed “” 48 C.F.R. § 538.270 (c). GSA also reserves the right to request and audit transactional data reflecting a prospective contractor’s actual commercial sales.”
United States ex rel. Thomas v. Siemens AG (2014) paed “48 C.F.R. §§ 538.270 , 272; 552.238-75. In contrast, the direct delivery VA contracts do not require vendors to offer price reductions during the term of the contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.