C.F.R. » Title 48 » CHAPTER 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION › SUBCHAPTER B—ACQUISITION PLANNING › PART 6—COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS › Subpart 6.3—Other Than Full and Open Competition

48 C.F.R. § 6.303

6.303 Justifications.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2011–2018 · leading case: Google, Inc. v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 661 (Fed. Cl. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Google, Inc. v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 661 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “” 48 C.F.R. § 6.303 -l(a). As the Administrative Record evidences, negotiations for a sole source contract with Microsoft “commenced” many months prior to July 15, 2010.”
Agustawestland North Am., Inc. v. United States, 127 Fed. Cl. 793 (Fed. Cl. 2016). · cites it 2× “” 48 C.F.R. § 6.303 — 2(b)(4). 25 . FAR 6.302 — 2(b)(7) requires, "[a] determination by the contracting officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.”
Loomacres, Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2018). · cites it 2× “§ 2304 , the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”), 48 C.F.R. 6.303–2, the Economy Act of 1933, 31 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.