C.F.R. » Title 48 » CHAPTER 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION › SUBCHAPTER B—ACQUISITION PLANNING › PART 8—REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES › Subpart 8.7—Acquisition From Nonprofit Agencies Employing People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled

48 C.F.R. § 8.705-1

8.705-1 General.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Ordering offices shall obtain supplies and services on the Procurement List from the central nonprofit agency or its designated AbilityOne participating nonprofit agencies, except that supplies identified on the Procurement List as available from DLA, GSA, or VA supply distribution facilities shall be obtained through DLA, GSA, or VA procedures. If a distribution facility cannot provide the supplies, it shall inform the ordering office, which shall then order from the AbilityOne participating nonprofit agency designated by the Committee.

(b) Supply distribution facilities in DLA and GSA shall obtain supplies on the Procurement List from the central nonprofit agency identified or its designated AbilityOneparticipating nonprofit agency.

[48 FR 42129, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 59 FR 67028, 67029, Dec. 28, 1994; 73 FR 53995, Sept. 17, 2008]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Goodwill Indus. of South Florida, Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Goodwill Indus. of South Florida, Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2022). · cites it 2× “Moreover, protestor quotes 48 C.F.R. § 8.705-1 (b), which states that “[s]upply distribution facilities in DLA and GSA shall obtain supplies on the Procurement List from the central nonprofit agency identified or its designated AbilityOne participating nonprofit regulation “is…”
Sekri, Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2022). “4th at 1068 (emphasis and alterations to quote in original) (quoting 48 C.F.R. § 8.705-1 ). The plaintiff argues that this quote demonstrates that the DLA is still violating its statutory and regulatory obligation to procure the ATAP from SEKRI.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.