48 C.F.R. § 9.500
9.500 Scope of subpart.
This subpart:
(a) Prescribes responsibilities, general rules, and procedures for identifying, evaluating, and resolving organizational conflicts of interest;
(b) Provides examples to assist contracting officers in applying these rules and procedures to individual contracting situations; and
(c) Implements section 8141 of the 1989 Department of Defense Appropriation Act, Pub. L. 100-463, 102 Stat. 2270-47 (1988).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1985–2016 · leading case: Axiom Resource Mgmt., Inc. v. United States, 564 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
Axiom Resource Mgmt., Inc. v. United States, 564 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “” 48 C.F.R. § 9.500 (a). Under 48 C.F.R. § 9.”
Pricewaterhousecoopers Pub. Sector, LLP v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 328 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “See 48 C.F.R. § 9.500 (2016); see also PAI Corp.”
KSEND v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 103 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “101-1 ] does not provide specific guidance regarding what may constitute a conflict, the GAO has found instructive the provisions of [ 48 C.F.R. § 9.500 ], which provide more specific conflict rules, albeit for government contractors”), aff' d, 56 FedAppx.”
Sra Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 114 Fed. Cl. 247 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “” 48 C.F.R. § 9.500 (a). 5 . "[P]art [366] establishes the minimum standards of integrity and fitness that contractors .”
Informatics Gen. Corp. v. Weinberger, 617 F. Supp. 331 (D.D.C. 1985). “Plaintiff contends that the award of the SETAC contract to EDS violates various conflict of interest provisions of the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR), 48 C.F.R. § 9.500 et seq. In particular, plaintiff argues that the award of the SETAC contract to EDS violates FAR…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.