49 C.F.R. § 179.100
General specifications applicable to pressure tank car tanks
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Rucker v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 381 N.E.2d 715 (Ill. App. Ct. 1978).
Rucker v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 381 N.E.2d 715 (Ill. App. Ct. 1978). “Subsequent to the accident, the DOT issued an order, effective August 30, 1974, requiring that all DOT 112A and 114A tank cars be equipped with headshields ( 49 CFR §179.100 — 23). As stated earlier, plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint with respect to GATX and Phillips sounded…”
Axiall Corp. v. Alltranstek LLC (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024). “49 C.F.R. §§ 179.100 to 179.103-5. -3- J-A22025-23 J-A22026-23 of [railroad tank] cars equipped with ACF200 underframes (the “2006 Safety Advisory”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.