49 C.F.R. § 190.1
Purpose and scope
(a) This part prescribes procedures used by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration in carrying out duties regarding pipeline safety under 49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq. (the pipeline safety laws) and 33 U.S.C. 1321 (the water pollution control laws).
(b) This subpart defines certain terms and prescribes procedures that are applicable to each proceeding described in this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1961–1997 · leading case: Mary Kane v. Branch Motor Express Co., 290 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1961).
Mary Kane v. Branch Motor Express Co., 290 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1961). “49 C.F.R. § 190.1 . Section 193.40, however, provides that “Every bus, truck, truck-tractor, and combination of motor vehicles * * * shall be equipped with brakes adequate to control the movement of, and to stop and to hold, such vehicle or combination of vehicles.”
R.R. Transfer Serv. v. City of Chicago, 386 U.S. 351 (1967). “See generally 49 CFR §190.1 et-seq. 17 In Atchison we- noted that the city retains authority to “exact reasonable fees for .”
S. Cal. Gas Co. v. Cal. Occupational Saf. & Health Appeals Bd., 58 Cal. App. 4th 200 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997). “( 49 C.F.R. §§ 190.1 , 190.201, 190.301 (1996).”
ANR Pipeline Co. v. Iowa State Com. Comm'n, 828 F.2d 465 (8th Cir. 1987). “See 49 C.F.R. § 190.1 (1986). . As the Commission points out, this notice and opportunity to intervene was of little value in this case, because the notice of application for the temporary certificate did not appear in the Federal Register until August 27, 1984, 49 Fed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.