C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER I—PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › SUBCHAPTER D—PIPELINE SAFETY › PART 195—TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS BY PIPELINE › Subpart H—Corrosion Control

49 C.F.R. § 195.571

What criteria must I use to determine the adequacy of cathodic protection?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Cathodic protection required by this subpart must comply with one or more of the applicable criteria and other considerations for cathodic protection contained paragraphs 6.2.2, 6.2.3, 6.2.4, 6.2.5 and 6.3 in NACE SP 0169 (incorporated by reference, see § 195.3).

[Amdt. 195-100, 80 FR 12781, Mar. 11, 2015]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. v. PUC (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. v. PUC (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2023). “452 or the cathodic protection provision in 49 C.F.R. §195.571 . The ALJ found that Sunoco followed its integrity management plan, which treats all segments of the Mariner East pipelines in Chester and Delaware Counties as if they are located in a high consequence area.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.