49 C.F.R. § 40.5

Who issues authoritative interpretations of this regulation?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

ODAPC and the DOT Office of General Counsel (OGC) provide written interpretations of the provisions of this part. These written DOT interpretations are the only official and authoritative interpretations concerning the provisions of this part. DOT agencies may incorporate ODAPC/OGC interpretations in written guidance they issue concerning drug and alcohol testing matters. Only Part 40 interpretations issued after August 1, 2001, are considered valid.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Taylor v. Se. Pennsylvania Transp. Auth. (septa), No. 2:23-cv-02140, 2024 WL 3203318 (E.D. Pa. June 27, 2024).
Taylor v. Se. Pennsylvania Transp. Auth. (septa), No. 2:23-cv-02140, 2024 WL 3203318 (E.D. Pa. June 27, 2024). “at ¶¶ 25–29 (quoting 49 C.F.R. §§ 40.5 , 40.7, 40.11, 40.355(g)–(k), (o), 40.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.