C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER VIII—NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD › PART 821—RULES OF PRACTICE IN AIR SAFETY PROCEEDINGS › Subpart F—Hearing

49 C.F.R. § 821.38

Evidence

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

In any proceeding under the rules in this part, all evidence which is relevant, material, reliable and probative, and not unduly repetitious or cumulative, shall be admissible. All other evidence shall be excluded. The Federal Rules of Evidence will be applied in these proceedings to the extent practicable.

[78 FR 57534, Sept. 19, 2013]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1977–2017 · leading case: Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Tech. AG, 222 F.R.D. 101 (E.D. Va. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Tech. AG, 222 F.R.D. 101 (E.D. Va. 2004). · cites it 2× “49 C.F.R. § 821.38 . Moreover, before the hearing, the parties were permitted to engage in discovery.”
Lackey v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 386 F. App'x 689 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 3× “§ 556 (d); 49 C.F.R. § 821.38 . An ALJ may exclude evidence under the APA or the ASP Rules where it is irrelevant, immaterial, or repetitious.”
Dickson v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., 639 F.3d 539 (D.C. Cir. 2011). “7 (quoting 49 C.F.R. § 821.38 ). The ALJ found the records trustworthy on the ground that medical personnel are trained to take statements and interview witnesses, and hence that such statements are likely to be credible.”
William L. Coppenbarger v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 558 F.2d 836 (7th Cir. 1977). “49 C.F.R. § 821.38 . The administrative law judge’s decision can then be appealed to the Board itself.”
Zeus Enter., Inc. v. Alphin Aircraft, Inc., 190 F.3d 238 (4th Cir. 1999). “See 49 C.F.R. § 821.38 (1998). Athough Aphin was not a party, the ALJ allowed it to intervene, with its participation confined to issues concerning the technical aspects of its repair work on the airplane.”
Heyl v. Babbitt, 364 F. App'x 653 (D.C. Cir. 2010). “§ 556 (d); 49 C.F.R. § 821.38 . Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.”
Patrick Theo Freiwald v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 686 F. App'x 719 (11th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “” 49 C.F.R. § 821.38 . The Federal Rules of Evidence apply in NTSB proceedings “to the extent practicable.”
Ferguson v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 352 F. App'x 192 (9th Cir. 2009). “” 49 C.F.R. § 821.38 . Conte was the FAA’s lone witness as to the revenue-generating nature of the disputed flights.”
Ferguson v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 352 F. App'x 192 (9th Cir. 2009). “” 49 C.F.R. § 821.38 . Conte was the FAA’s lone witness as to the revenue-generating nature of the disputed flights.”
Heyl v. Babbitt, 364 F. App'x 653 (D.C. Cir. 2010). “§ 556 (d); 49 C.F.R. § 821.38 . Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.