C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER II—MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD › SUBCHAPTER A—ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES › PART 1203—PROCEDURES FOR REVIEW OF RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 C.F.R. § 1203.11

Request for regulation review

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) An interested person or the Special Counsel may submit a request for regulation review.

(b) Contents of request. (1) Each request for regulation review must include the following information:

(i) The name, address, and signature of the requester's representative or, if the requester has no representative, of the requester;

(ii) A citation identifying the regulation being challenged;

(iii) A statement (along with any relevant documents) describing in detail the reasons why the regulation would require an employee to commit a prohibited personnel practice; or the reasons why the implementation of the regulation requires an employee to commit a prohibited personnel practice;

(iv) Specific identification of the prohibited personnel practice at issue; and

(v) A description of the action the requester would like the Board to take.

(2) If the prohibited personnel practice at issue is one prohibited by 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(12), the request must include the following additional information:

(i) Identification of the law or regulation that allegedly would be or has been violated, and how it would be or has been violated; and

(ii) Identification of the merit system principles at issue and an explanation of the way in which the law or regulation at issue implements or directly concerns those principles.

[54 FR 23632, June 2, 1989, as amended at 65 FR 57939, Sept. 27, 2000]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2001–2024 · leading case: Kelli Holloran v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. (MSPB 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kelli Holloran v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. (MSPB 2024). · cites it 4× “5 C.F.R. § 1203.11 (b); see Roesel v. Office of Personnel Management, 119 M.”
Thomas Forest v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. (MSPB 2023). · cites it 3× “5 C.F.R. § 1203.11 (b); see Roesel v. Office of Personnel Management, 119 M.”
Rakhmatulla Asatov v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. (MSPB 2016). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. § 1203.11 (b); see Roesel v. Office of Personnel Management, 119 M.”
Rakhmatulla Asatov v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. (MSPB 2016). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. § 1203.11 (b); see Roesel v. Office of Personnel Management, 119 M.”
Rakhmatulla Asatov v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. (MSPB 2016). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. § 1203.11 (b); see Roesel v. Office of Personnel Management, 119 M.”
Rakhmatulla Asatov v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. (MSPB 2016). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. § 1203.11 (b); see Roesel v. Office of Personnel Management, 119 M.”
Rakhmatulla Asatov v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. (MSPB 2016). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. § 1203.11 (b); see Roesel v. Office of Personnel Management, 119 M.”
Peter McMillan v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. (MSPB 2022). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. § 1203.11 (b); see Roesel v. Office of Personnel Management, 119 M.”
Peggy Maloney v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. (MSPB 2023). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. § 1203.11 (b). See Di Jorio v. Office of Personnel Management, 54 M.”
Karl Brookins v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. (MSPB 2024). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. § 1203.11 (b); see Di Jorio v. Office of Personnel Management, 54 M.”
Nat'l Ass'n of Gov't Inspectors, Unit 1 v. OPM & Dep't of the Navy (MSPB 2014). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. § 1203.11 (b); see Roesel v. Office of Personnel Management, 119 M.”
Nat'l Ass'n of Gov't Inspectors, Unit 1 v. OPM & Dep't of the Navy (MSPB 2014). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. § 1203.11 (b); see Roesel v. Office of Personnel Management, 119 M.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.