5 C.F.R. § 151.122
Candidacy; exceptions
Section 151.121(c) does not apply to—
(a) The Governor or Lieutenant Governor of a State or an individual authorized by law to act as Governor;
(b) The Mayor of a city;
(c) A duly elected head of an executive department of a State, municipality, or the District of Columbia, who is not classified under a merit or civil service system of a State, municipality, or the District of Columbia;
(d) An individual holding elective office;
(e) Activity in connection with a nonpartisan election; or
(f) Candidacy for a position of officer of a political party, delegate to a political party convention, member of a National, State, or local committee of a political party, or any similar position.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: Molina-Crespo v. United States Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 547 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2008).
Molina-Crespo v. United States Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 547 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2008). “5 C.F.R. 151.122(b) (1974, superseded). Under the current version of the Hatch Act, state and local employees have much greater freedom to participate in political campaigns and to associate publically with candidates and political parties.”
Molina-Crespo v. US Merit Sys. (6th Cir. 2008). “5 C.F.R. 151.122(b) (1974, superseded). Under the current version of the Hatch Act, state and local employees have much greater freedom to participate in political campaigns and to associate publically with candidates and political parties.”
— 5 C.F.R. § 151.122(b) — 2 cases
Molina-Crespo v. United States Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 547 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2008). “5 C.F.R. 151.122(b) (1974, superseded). Under the current version of the Hatch Act, state and local employees have much greater freedom to participate in political campaigns and to associate publically with candidates and political parties.”
Molina-Crespo v. US Merit Sys. (6th Cir. 2008). “5 C.F.R. 151.122(b) (1974, superseded). Under the current version of the Hatch Act, state and local employees have much greater freedom to participate in political campaigns and to associate publically with candidates and political parties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.