C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—CIVIL SERVICE REGULATIONS › PART 213—EXCEPTED SERVICE › Subpart C—Excepted Schedules

5 C.F.R. § 213.3401

Positions other than those of a confidential or policy determining character for which the competitive service requirements make impracticable the adequate recruitment of sufficient numbers of students attending qualifying educational institutions or individuals who have recently completed qualifying educational programs

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

As authorized by OPM, agencies may make appointments under this section to positions other than those of a confidential or policy-determining character for which the competitive service requirements make impracticable the adequate recruitment and selection of sufficient numbers of students attending qualifying educational institutions or individuals who have recently completed qualifying educational programs. These positions, which may be filled in the excepted service to enable more effective recruitment from all segments of society by using means of recruiting and assessing candidates that diverge from the rules generally applicable to the competitive service, constitute Schedule D Pathways Programs. Appointments under this authority are subject to the basic qualification standards established by the Office of Personnel Management for the occupation and grade level unless otherwise stated.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2014–2015 · leading case: David Dean v. Dep't of Labor, 2015 MSPB 22 (MSPB 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
David Dean v. Dep't of Labor, 2015 MSPB 22 (MSPB 2015). · cites it 3× “5 C.F.R. § 213.3401 ; 5 C.F.R. Part 362, Subparts A, C; 5 C.”
Dawson v. United States, 116 Fed. Cl. 664 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “” See 5 C.F.R. § 213.3401 (stating that Pathway Program participants are appointed under Schedule D).”
Dawson v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2014). “” See 5 C.F.R. § 213.3401 (stating that Pathway Program participants are appointed under Schedule D).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.