5 C.F.R. § 293.307

Disposition of folders of former Federal employees

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Folders of persons separated from Federal employment must be retained by the losing agency for 30 working days after separation, and may be retained for additional 60 days (90 days where administratively necessary, e.g., where an appeal or an allegation of discrimination is made or where an employee retires or dies in service). Thereafter, the OPF must be transferred to the General Services Administration, National Personnel Records Center (Civilian Personnel Records), 111 Winnebago Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63118.

(b) When a former Federal employee is reappointed in the Federal service, the National Personnel Records Center (Civilian Personnel Records) shall, upon request, transfer the OPF to the new employing agency.

(c) Agencies are responsible for all costs associated with the establishment and maintenance of OPFs and the transfer of OPFs to the National Personnel Records Center.

(d) Agencies are responsible for all costs associated with agency-initiated requests for OPFs or services from the National Personnel Records Center.

[50 FR 3309, Jan. 24, 1985; 50 FR 8993, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended at 76 FR 52537, Aug. 23, 2011]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2009–2013 · leading case: Hart v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 648 F. Supp. 2d 113 (D.D.C. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hart v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 648 F. Supp. 2d 113 (D.D.C. 2009). “2 (quoting 5 C.F.R. § 293.307 (a)); Luczynski Deck ¶ 10.”

Parker v. United States Dep't of Just., 986 F. Supp. 2d 30 (D.D.C. 2013). “’s Reply at 2, citing 5 C.F.R. § 293.307 (a) (stating that a federal employee’s OPF must be transferred to the NPRC no more than 120 days after separation from government service); see also Vanek Deck ¶4.”

Thornton-Bey v. Exec. Off. for U.S. Attorneys, 844 F. Supp. 2d 159 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “” See 5 C.F.R. § 293.307 (a). If Plaintiff truly seeks the oath, he will have to request it of the NPRC at the address provided him.”

Hart v. United States Dep't of Just. (D.D.C. 2009). “2 (quoting 5 C.F.R. § 293.307 (a)); Luczynski Decl. ¶ 10.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.