C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—CIVIL SERVICE REGULATIONS › PART 551—PAY ADMINISTRATION UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT › Subpart B—Exemptions and Exclusions

5 C.F.R. § 551.201

Agency authority

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The employing agency must review and make a determination on each employee's exemption status.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1984–2005 · leading case: Adams v. United States, 391 F.3d 1212 (Fed. Cir. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Adams v. United States, 391 F.3d 1212 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “Appellants’ Status Under the FLSA Pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 551.201 , the BATF, the DEA, the IRS, the Customs Service, and the USSS independently determined, as the respective employing agencies, that Appellants were administrative employees exempt from the FLSA and its overtime…”
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Donald J. Devine, Dir., Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 733 F.2d 114 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “at 49,496 (to be codified at 5 C.F.R. § 551.201 ).”
Ackerman v. United States, 21 Cl. Ct. 484 (Ct. Cl. 1990). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. § 551.201 . OPM simply issues supplemental interpretations or instructions to the employing agencies.”
Amshey v. United States, 26 Cl. Ct. 582 (Ct. Cl. 1992). “5 C.F.R. § 551.201 . . 5 C.F.R. § 551.202 .”
Palardy v. Horner, 711 F. Supp. 667 (D. Mass. 1989). “See 5 C.F.R. § 551.201 (“The employing agency shall exempt from the overtime provisions of the Act any employee who meets the exemption criteria of this subpart and such supplemental interpretations or instructions as shall be issued by the Office of Personnel Management.”
Baca v. United States, 29 Fed. Cl. 354 (Fed. Cl. 1993). “Determining whether a federal employee qualifies for one of the FLSA exemption provisions requires a thorough review not only of OPM regulations, contained at 5 C.F.R. §§ 551.201 -.208, but also of all “supplemental interpretations or instructions .”
Bates v. United States, 60 Fed. Cl. 319 (Fed. Cl. 2004). “5 C.F.R. § 551.201 . The only exemption category at issue here is the admin *322 istrative exemption.”
Christofferson v. United States, 67 Fed. Cl. 68 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “He recalls that he took work away from both individuals and did not permit them to claim further hours.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.