C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—CIVIL SERVICE REGULATIONS › PART 575—RECRUITMENT, RELOCATION, AND RETENTION INCENTIVES; SUPERVISORY DIFFERENTIALS; AND EXTENDED ASSIGNMENT INCENTIVES › Subpart B—Relocation Incentives

5 C.F.R. § 575.201

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart contains regulations implementing 5 U.S.C. 5753, which authorizes payment of relocation incentives. An agency may pay a relocation incentive to a current employee who must relocate to accept a position in a different geographic area under the conditions specified in this subpart provided the agency determines that the position is likely to be difficult to fill in the absence of an incentive.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2019–2021 · leading case: Bell v. United States, 20 F.4th 768 (Fed. Cir. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bell v. United States, 20 F.4th 768 (Fed. Cir. 2021). “Appellants concede that the statute and implementing regulations use discretionary language in empowering the Office of Personnel Management to provide relocation in- centive bonuses. Appellants’ Reply Br.”
Bell v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2019). · cites it 4× “See generally 5 C.F.R. §§ 575.201 , et seq. Specifically, 5 C.”
Crawley v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2020). · cites it 4× “, ) ) Keywords: Breach of Contract; Drug Plaintiffs, ) Enforcement Administration; Relocation ) Pay; 5 C.F.R. § 575.201 ; 5 C.F.R. v. ) § 575.”
Oliva v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2019). · cites it 2× “See generally 5 C.F.R. §§ 575.201 , et seq. Under these regulations, an agency may pay a relocation incentive to a current employee who must relocate to accept a position in a different geographic area, if the agency determines that the position will likely be difficult to fill…”
Bell v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2021). “Appellants concede that the statute and implementing regulations use discretionary language in empowering the Office of Personnel Management to provide relocation in- centive bonuses. Appellants’ Reply Br.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.