5 C.F.R. § 735.203
What are the restrictions on conduct prejudicial to the Government?
An employee shall not engage in criminal, infamous, dishonest, immoral, or notoriously disgraceful conduct, or other conduct prejudicial to the Government.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1977–2015 · leading case: Crandon v. United States, 494 U.S. 152 (1990).
Crandon v. United States, 494 U.S. 152 (1990). “" 5 CFR § 735.203 (b) (1989). Under the original version of § 209(a), enacted in 1917, it was even clearer that "contribution to" or "supplementation of" salary envisioned regular, salary-like payments.”
Abaqueta v. United States, 255 F. Supp. 2d 1020 (D. Ariz. 2003). “The Appeals Board upheld the penalty agreeing that it was a violation of 5 C.F.R. § 735.203 , which prohibits employee conduct prejudicial to the government.”
Rajan v. Principi, 90 F. App'x 262 (9th Cir. 2004). “” Leave Administration, Medical Center Memorandum, 05-98-06 (August 1998); Employee Conduct, Medical Center Memorandum, 05-98-25 (September 1998); 5 CFR § 735.203 . Under the highly deferential standard of review of 38 U.”
Alexander v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 21 F. App'x 919 (Fed. Cir. 2001). “Alexander further alleges Board error on the ground that the OPM charges do not meet the criteria of 5 C.F.R. § 735.203 . This regulation states: An employee shall not engage in criminal, infamous, dishonest, immoral, or notoriously disgraceful conduct, or other conduct…”
Barnes v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 21 F. App'x 940 (Fed. Cir. 2001). “Barnes was issued a letter of proposed removal for engaging in conduct prejudicial to the government in violation of 5 C.F.R. § 735.203 by allowing photographs to be taken of her while exposing her crotch and leaving the photographs in her desk.”
Bradferd C. Bidnick v. Dep't of Just. (MSPB 2015). “Moreover, cheating on an examination is contrary to 5 C.F.R. § 735.203 , which applies to the civil service generally, and provides that an employee shall not engage in criminal, infamous, dishonest, immoral, or notoriously disgraceful conduct, or other conduct prejudicial to…”
Legality of Presidential Appointees' Writing Articles & Books for Pub. (OLC 1977). “11222, §§ 202, 204, and 205; 5 CFR 735.203, 205, and 206. 4It m ight be suggested that the $2,000 ceiling im posed by 2 U .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.