5 C.F.R. § 752.601

Coverage

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Adverse actions covered. This subpart applies to suspensions for more than 14 days and removals from the civil service as set forth in 5 U.S.C. 7542.

(b) Actions excluded. (1) An agency may not take a suspension action of 14 days or less.

(2) This subpart does not apply to actions taken under 5 U.S.C. 1215, 3592, 3595, 7532, or 7515.

(c) Employees covered. This subpart covers the following appointees:

(1) A career appointee—

(i) Who has completed the probationary period in the Senior Executive Service;

(ii) Who is not required to serve a probationary period in the Senior Executive Service; or

(iii) Who was covered under 5 U.S.C. 7511 immediately before appointment to the Senior Executive Service.

(2) A limited term or limited emergency appointee—

(i) Who received the limited appointment without a break in service in the same agency as the one in which the employee held a career or career-conditional appointment (or an appointment of equivalent tenure as determined by the Office of Personnel Management) in a permanent civil service position outside the Senior Executive Service; and

(ii) Who was covered under 5 U.S.C. 7511 immediately before appointment to the Senior Executive Service.

(d) Employees excluded. This subpart does not cover an appointee who is serving as a reemployed annuitant.

[74 FR 63532, Dec. 4, 2009, as amended at 85 FR 65987, Oct. 16, 2020]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2024–2026 · leading case: Donald LaVoy v. Dep't of Agric. (MSPB 2024).
Donald LaVoy v. Dep't of Agric. (MSPB 2024). · cites it 2× “§ 7511 (a) and 5 C.F.R. § 752.601 and, therefore, lacked Board appeal rights.”
Palmeri v. MSPB (Fed. Cir. 2026). · cites it 2× “Palmeri also argues that his right to appeal was provided for by 5 C.F.R. § 752.601 (c)(iii), but this pro- vision only covers removals described by section 7452, which excludes FBI-DEA SES employees.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.