C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—CIVIL SERVICE REGULATIONS › PART 831—RETIREMENT › Subpart Q—Phased Retirement

5 C.F.R. § 831.1701

Applicability and purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart contains the regulations implementing provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8336a authorizing phased retirement. This subpart establishes the eligibility requirements for making an election to enter phased retirement status, the procedures for making an election, the record-keeping requirements, and the methods to be used for certain computations not addressed elsewhere in part 831.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1983–1992 · leading case: Boniface v. Boniface, 656 S.W.2d 131 (Tex. App. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Boniface v. Boniface, 656 S.W.2d 131 (Tex. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “[emphasis added] In the regulations implementing these amendments, at 5 C.F.R. § 831.1701 (1983), we find the following: This subpart implements portions of Pub.”
Desfosses v. Desfosses, 813 P.2d 366 (Idaho Ct. App. 1991). “§ 8345 (j); 5 C.F.R. § 831.1701 et seq. Jim objected to Annie’s motion, contending that the judgment Annie was seeking to enforce had been obtained through fraud *29 and perjury, and that the judgment was part of a pending appeal in the Supreme Court.”
Matter of Succession of Sims, 464 So. 2d 991 (La. Ct. App. 1985). “5 C.F.R. § 831.1701 through .1711, effective March 7, 1980, was adopted and promulgated to implement 5 U.”
Naydan v. Naydan, 800 S.W.2d 637 (Tex. App. 1990). “8345 and its interpretative regulation 5 CFR 831.1701 et seq. The Statement of Facts record of the trial of this cause is only 43 pages of evidence until [Connie’s counsel] called himself to testify regarding attorneys fees on page 43 through page 54.”
Roth v. Roth, 604 A.2d 1033 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992). “To determine the coverage of Subpart Q, we must look to 5 C.F.R. § 831.1701 , entitled purpose: This subpart regulates the Office of Personnel Management’s adjudication of claims arising out of State court orders that affect civil service retirement benefits.”
Mary Ann Burke v. William J. Casey, Dir., Cent. Intelligence Agency & Carol Burke, 701 F.2d 302 (4th Cir. 1983). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. §§ 831.1701 — .1711 (1982). The regulations implement in part 5 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.