50 C.F.R. § 29.2

Cooperative land management

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Cooperative agreements with persons for crop cultivation, haying, grazing, or the harvest of vegetative products, including plantlife, growing with or without cultivation on wildlife refuge areas may be executed on a share-in-kind basis when such agreements are in aid of or benefit to the wildlife management of the area.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2014–2016 · leading case: Hymas v. United States, 810 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
Hymas v. United States, 810 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2016). · cites it 15× “1, 1960) (“Final Rules”) (emphases added) (codified at 50 C.F.R. § 29.2 (2012)). The Service defines a “person” as “an individual, club, association, partnership, corporation, or private or public body.”
Hymas v. United States, 117 Fed. Cl. 466 (Fed. Cl. 2014). · cites it 20× “; Cooperative Farming Agreements; Cooperative Land Management, 50 C.F.R. § 29.2 (1960); Exec. Order. No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.