7 C.F.R. § 1.186

Allowable fees and expenses

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Awards will be based on rates customarily charged by persons engaged in the business of acting as attorneys, agents, and expert witnesses, even if the services were made available without charge or at reduced rate to the applicant.

(b) In proceedings commenced on or after the effective date of this paragraph, no award for the fee of an attorney or agent under the rules in this subpart may exceed $150 per hour. No award to compensate an expert witness may exceed the highest rate at which the Department pays expert witnesses, which is set out at § 1.150 of this part. However, an award also may include the reasonable expenses of the attorney, agent, or witness as a separate item, if the attorney, agent, or witness ordinarily charges clients separately for such expenses.

(c) In determining the reasonableness of the fee sought for an attorney, agent, or expert witness, the adjudicative officer shall consider the following:

(1) If the attorney, agent or witness is in private practice, his or her customary fee for similar services, or if an employee of the applicant, the fully allocated cost of the services;

(2) The prevailing rate for similar services in the community in which the attorney, agent, or witness ordinarily performs services;

(3) The time actually spent in the representation of the applicant;

(4) The time reasonably spent in light of the difficulty or complexity of the issues in the proceeding; and

(5) Such other factors as may bear on the value of the services provided.

(d) The reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project or similar matter prepared on behalf of a party may be awarded, to the extent that the charge for the service does not exceed the prevailing rate for similar services, and the study or other matter was necessary for preparation of the applicant's case.

[67 FR 63237, Oct. 11, 2002, as amended at 76 FR 11668, Mar. 3, 2011]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: B & D Land & Livestock Co. v. Schafer, 615 F. Supp. 2d 950 (N.D. Iowa 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

B & D Land & Livestock Co. v. Schafer, 615 F. Supp. 2d 950 (N.D. Iowa 2009). · cites it 3× “The government counters that the cap for the hourly rate for attorneys in administrative proceedings is $125 per hour pursuant to 7 C.F.R. § 1.186 , and disputes the sufficiency of counsel’s proof of a change in the cost of living or the appropriateness of basing enhanced fees…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.