7 C.F.R. § 271.8

Information collection/recordkeeping—OMB assigned control numbers

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
7 CFR section where requirements are describedCurrent OMB control No.
272.1(f)0584-0010
0584-0025
0584-0034
0584-0037
0584-0064
0584-0069
0584-0074
0584-0080
0584-0081
0584-0083
0584-0299
0584-0303
0584-0336
0584-0339
272.2(d)0584-0064
272.2(a), (c), (d), (e), (f)0584-0083
272.5(c)0584-0083
272.3(a), (b), (c)0584-0083
272.6(g), (h)0584-0025
273.2(a), (b), (c), (e), (f), (h)0584-0064
273.5(b)0584-0064
273.7(a), (d), (e)0584-0339
273.7(c)0584-0083
0584-0339
273.7(c)(17)0584-0614
273.8(b), (e )0584-0064
273.9(d)0584-0496
273.9(d) (c)0584-0064
273.10(e), (g)(1)0584-0064
273.11(b)0584-0496
273.11(i)(1)-(4)0584-0080
0584-0081
273.11(i)(5)0584-0081
273.11(i)(6)0584-0080
0584-0081
273.12(a), (b), (c), (d)0584-0064
273.13(a), (b)0584-0064
273.14(b)0584-0064
273.16(a), (b), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i)0584-0064
273.18(h)0584-0069
273.21(h)0584-0064
273.24(f)0584-0479
274.3(d)0584-0069
0584-0080
274.4(a)0584-0080
274.4(b)0584-0080
0584-0081
274.6(a), (b) and (e)0584-0080
0584-0081
275.2(a)0584-0010
0584-0303
275.4(a)0584-0010
0584-0303
275.4(b)0584-0010
275.4(c)0584-0034
0584-0074
0584-0299
275.5(a), (b)0584-0010
275.6(b)0584-0010
275.8(a)0584-0010
275.9(b), (g)0584-0010
275.10(a)0584-0074
0584-0299
0584-0303
275.11(a)0584-0303
275.12(b), (c), (d), (e)0584-0074
275.12(f), (g)0584-0299
275.13(b), (d), (e)0584-0034
275.14(c), (d)0584-0034
0584-0074
0584-0299
275.16(b), (c), (d)0584-0010
275.17(a), (b)0584-0010
275.18(a), (b)0584-0010
275.19(a), (b), (c)0584-0010
275.20(a)0584-0010
275.21(b)0584-0034
0584-0074
0584-0299
275.21(c), (d), (e)0584-0034
275.22(a), (b)0584-0010
275.230584-0010
0584-0034
0584-0074
0584-0299
277.18(a), (c), (d), (f), (i)0584-0083
278.1(a), (b), (l)0584-0008
278.5(c), (d), (f)0584-0008
278.6(b)0584-0008
278.7(b), (c)0584-0008
278.8(a)0584-0008
280.7(c), (d), (g)0584-0336
280.9(b)0584-0037
280.10(a)0584-0336
[82 FR 2034, Jan. 6, 2017, as amended at 89 FR 90568, Nov. 18, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1972–1977 · leading case: Aiken v. Obledo, 442 F. Supp. 628 (E.D. Cal. 1977).
Aiken v. Obledo, 442 F. Supp. 628 (E.D. Cal. 1977). · cites it 2× “§ 2019 (e), and the plan of operation must contain an agreement that the state agency in charge will conform with all FNS(FS) Instructions and requirements, 7 CFR § 271.8 (c)(1), and the state plan may not be changed without prior approval by FNS.”
LaRue v. Swoap, 51 Cal. App. 3d 543 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 4× “) FNS requires that the state's plan of operation contain an agreement that the state agency in charge of the administration of the program will conform with all FNS requirements and instructions ( 7 C.F.R. § 271.8 (c)(1)), and prohibits any change in the state's plan or any…”
Jackie Anderson v. Earl Butz, as Sec'y of the Dep't of Agric., 550 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1977). “1976); 7 C.F.R. § 271.8 (c)(1) (1976)], its effect will be widespread and immediate.”
Wolston v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Human Resources Soc. Servs. Admin., 291 A.2d 85 (D.C. 1972). · cites it 5× “[1] Complaining of the proposed increase, petitioner requested and was granted a hearing as required by 7 C.F.R. § 271.8 (b) (3) (1971). Because of illness petitioner was not present at the hearing.”
Dean v. Butz, 428 F. Supp. 477 (D. Haw. 1977). “7 C.F.R. § 271.8 . Rather, “similar” means similar to the examples enunciated in 7 C.”
Reyes v. Klein, 411 F. Supp. 1241 (D.N.J. 1976). “3 (a); 7 C.F.R. 271.8(a)-(e). The issue then becomes whether the Food and Nutrition Service approval of the “immediate exchange” program complies with the statutory requirement that the Secretary provide a “reasonable opportunity” for the exercise of the variable purchase option.”
— 7 C.F.R. § 271.8(a) — 1 case
Reyes v. Klein, 411 F. Supp. 1241 (D.N.J. 1976). “3 (a); 7 C.F.R. 271.8(a)-(e). The issue then becomes whether the Food and Nutrition Service approval of the “immediate exchange” program complies with the statutory requirement that the Secretary provide a “reasonable opportunity” for the exercise of the variable purchase option.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.